Monday, 5 October 2015

Online Trolls Hall of Shame (4) Jason Z Roder of Michigan USA

Jason Z Roder of Michigan USA is not a popular guy. On his birthday, May 2nd, all of FIVE people wished him happy birthday on Facebook. Aaaaahhhh.....Sad.

Jason is not a very handsome guy either, as he doesn't post a photo of himself, Just this very suitable image of an online troll!
It couldn't be more appropriate.
Jason's occupation is being a troll and a pest who sends unimaginative messages of abuse, usually calling people "bigots" [yawn] or a "douchebag" whatever that is.
Rationality is not Jason's strong point. When a mentally ill teenager in Ohio threw himself in front of a lorry, because he was convinced he was a girl and his parents would not humour his delusion, Jason Z Roder firmly put all the blame on a journalist who wrote an article commenting on it. He got hysterical and accused her of having "bloodsoaked hands".
I know....weird.
It amounts to slander and defamation because he named her and made his accusation publicly. Proving that he is almost as crazy as the mixed-up teenager.

Friday, 2 October 2015

Online Trolls Hall of Shame (3) James Simmons

Keep a watch out for harmful pests this autumn! No, I don't mean flesh-eating spiders but something else just as vile and horrible.
James Simmons is another of those venomous internet trolls who send nasty messages and abuse. He spreads lies, intolerance and aggression.

James is an avid reader of Pink News and believes everything that he reads in it. 
He then circulates it on the internet, where it gets more and more garbled as it goes around. 
He is proud of the way that he stalks people and posts gibberish about them. People like James Simmons are a serious threat to freedom of speech, and freedom of speech is the cornerstone of democracy. It used to be enshrined as one of our rights under common law, but now it has been replaced with the new blasphemy laws of so-called "hate speech". There is no worse hate-speech than the invective sent by trolls  like this  - it's always full of rage and insult, threats of violence and the recurrent question "how dare you express an opinion that is different from mine or that of Puke News?"
But I do dare, Mr Simmons.  That is why you hate me so obsessively. I do dare.

Insider Dealing

Hundreds of orchards all over England will be chopped down now or left to rot because the EU has decided to slap a tax on small-scale cider producers.

The announcement was made last February 26th. Previously under EU law anyone who produced less than seven thousand litres per year was exempt from tax. This enabled small-scale craft producers to make limited quantities of cider for a discerning drinker, and sell it at farmer's markets or farm shops. A lot of these will now go out of business because their profit margin is so small and the paperwork is just another headache.  
It seems perverse from every reasonable point of view to be clobbering the cider-makers. They are an important part of our farming tradition.
The National Association of Cider makers has repeatedly called on the government to reduce duty on their product. This year they requested an exemption on duty for small scale cider producers. It did not happen. Instead, the EU upped their tax.
Cider-making is a highly environmentally-friendly activity that creates seven thousand jobs in the countryside, and could create more since the demand for the product is growing. Orchards of apple and pear trees are also ideal for encouraging bees, many species of which are threatened. Yet the industry meets with nothing but obstacles and disapproval. Growers of cider apples would love to be able to plant more orchards and expand their production, but they dare not invest money when the duty is so high and always liable to arbitrary hikes.

 So we face the absurd situation of England, an ideal country for the growing of apples and pears, having to import apples and juice from abroad to make cider. Beautiful orchards are destroyed or built over. It does not make sense.

Monday, 28 September 2015

It Serves Maryam Namazie Right to Be Banned from Warwick University #MaryamNamazie

It is difficult to feel sorry for Maryam Namazie, the self-styled and self-proclaimed leader of the Council of ex-Muslims of Britain.

So she has been banned from speaking at Warwick University because her views, as a ex-Muslim and non-believer in God or any religion, might offend devout followers of her former faith. Well, boo-hoo.

If Ms Namazie were a proponent of free speech, civil rights or tolerant, polite debate she might merit some sympathy, but she is not, and she never has been. She is a communist and a politically-correct left-winger who practices censorship, and wants to silence the views of anyone who disagrees with her - or anyone who possibly might have something to teach her. Since she practises this self-righteous politically-correct exclusion of other people's views, she does not deserve a moment's sympathy.

It is frankly rather funny that she now complains about being treated in precisely the way she treats others.

She told The Independent she was “angry” her talk had been blocked. “They’re basically labelling me a racist and an extremist for speaking out against Islam and Islamism,” she said.
What a laugh, when this silly woman has openly labelled others who speak out against Islamic extremism or religious persecution as "racist" and extremist". This idiotic woman has publicly and pointedly sided with the PC censors, and mouthed their clich├ęs about "offensive", "extremist" or "safe spaces". She has taken their line by labelling anyone who criticizes Islam as "racist", "extremist" and "right-wing". She has tried to assume a moral high ground because she subscribes to one form of authoritarian tyranny - communism - rather than another, which prevails in her country of origin. Her attitude is that only those who support communism deserve a "platform".

The very, very stupid Ms Namazie.

Ms Namazie can whinge all she likes but the result is comical, as she is hoist with her own petard. She is now accused of "inciting hatred" which is exactly what she has accused others of doing...simply because they are not communists. She will find that her chums on the left, Jeremy Corbyn and co., give her no support. Her comrades in Political Crapbook will turn a cold shoulder and pretend they don't know her.

Warwick University will not be missing anything much by banning her, nor will Trinity College which has apparently banished her too. She likes to give the world terrific insights such as: "Religion is just stupid shit that somebody made up." Apparently such a level of debate impresses the left-wingers and Guardianistas, because she has got an award for it!!! She has often, in her blog and her public interviews, compared Islam to fascism or Nazism, and at the same time she gets furious if anybody else does that. She is not very intelligent, her writing shows no profound thought and Richard Dawkins need not worry she will be a rival for his place in the secular limelight.

“Unfortunately it is part of a worrying wave of censorship that we’re seeing across British universities under the guise of ‘safe spaces’… it’s utterly disheartening,” said Stephen Evans, the society’s campaigns manager. The concept of “safe spaces” had a “chilling effect on free speech,” he added.
Isaac Leigh, president of Warwick Student Union said: “The initial decision was made for the right of Muslim students not to feel intimidated or discriminated against on their university campus… rather than in the interest of suppressing free speech.”
The group’s president, Benjamin David, said: “The infringement of free-speech is becoming insidiously ubiquitous, and many universities, including Warwick, are circumventing the freedom of speech in pursuit of inoffensive, sanitary narratives.”
You don't say?

The move has also been criticised by the National Secular Society, which said it would be writing to Warwick University “to remind them of their legal duty to promote and protect free speech”.  Funny  - did they intervene when Oxford University banned a controversial debate last year after a similar outcry?
“Unfortunately it is part of a worrying wave of censorship that we’re seeing across British universities under the guise of ‘safe spaces’… it’s utterly disheartening,” said Stephen Evans, the society’s campaigns manager. The concept of “safe spaces” had a “chilling effect on free speech,” he added. 
Surprise, surprise! And guess who took the lead in this form of censorship and tyranny? Yes, the militant homosexuals. All that stuff about "safe spaces" is taken straight out of the LGBT handbook. Namazie is a blind follower of LGBT claptrap. She has crawled to their dictates, repeated their jargon about "fomohobia" and now their censorship tactics have silenced her too!!
Isaac Leigh, president of Warwick Student Union said: “The initial decision was made for the right of Muslim students not to feel intimidated or discriminated against on their university campus… rather than in the interest of suppressing free speech.” 
But suppressing free speech is exactly what it does, and this amounts to a form of violence and intimidation. Namazie has reaped what she sowed and the saddest bit is that she is too stupid to learn anything from this experience.

Sunday, 27 September 2015

Our Idiot Politicians Haven't Got the Faintest Idea What is Going On

Our smug politicians, enjoying dinners at their party political conferences, should be slapped in the face to make them sit up and take notice of this case.

Baby Donald

A baby has died after having to sleep rough with his homeless parents in a car in Bournemouth. I am not surprised at this as every time I walk through Oxford or any other town in England I see beggars and homeless people. I see them in Birmingham, I see them in Leicester, I see them in London. So does everybody else ...apart from the politicians, apparently. Our slithery, untrustworthy PM is far too busy with regime change in distant countries to take an interest in such domestic trivia.

A friend of mine was in an East London railway station yesterday and saw a young woman begging. She was about 25, and explained that she was from Liverpool and was homeless. My friend asked her if she needed money to go to the Night Shelter, and the young woman replied that there was a queue of 64 other people who would have to drop dead before she was offered a place.  It was the same at most other Night Shelters she had tried.

The baby who died in Bournemouth was apparently named Donald, and his parents had been homeless for months...and months.

The couple are understood to be living in a bed and breakfast and have yet to find permanent housing.
In July, they said they were unable to find enough money for a deposit and had stayed at a Boscombe bed and breakfast for a couple of nights, and had also slept in their car.
They said they felt let down by local councils.
Both Poole Borough Council and East Dorset District Council were contacted for comment after it emerged the mum had contacted their housing departments for help in the past. A spokesman for East Dorset said they had never received any requests to re-home the family.
Poole Borough Council confirmed their housing officers had spoken to the couple, and had offered advice and support, but were unable to help because she was based in Verwood at the time of her inquiry.
Donald's mum, referred to only as 39-year-old Jane, was admitted to Poole Hospital suffering pre-eclampsia and kidney problems. Donald was delivered two weeks early by emergency caesarean section on July 6. The pair were kept in for a week due to ongoing concerns for Jane's health, and the baby boy was also admitted to NICU for a time due to low blood sugar levels.
The first time mum, who didn't think she would ever have children, told the Echo at the time: "I love him to bits. I just want him to be safe."
After hearing of Donald's death, Ben Tomlin, housing services manager, Borough of Poole said: "Borough of Poole was contacted by the mother and though she was not eligible, she was provided with as much support and guidance as possible.
"She last approached us in May and hadn’t returned to Poole for help after her baby was born. Our deepest sympathies are with her at this time."
Well that's a great help isn't it?

Ten Worst "Gay" Myths Refuted

Let’s all save ourselves time. When arguing, just refer to these common homosexual myths by their numbers…we’ve all heard them often enough!
1. “Gays are 5-10% of the population.” False. They are 1.5% according to the UK Office of National Statistics and a similar percentage in other countries.
2. The Gay Gene. LGBT militants claim that some people are “born gay”. Wrong. This can and has been scientifically refuted. More than fourteen different studies into the orientation of identical twins have shown that there is no genetic pre-disposition, nor can uterine environment be a factor, as in twins it is the same, yet in 97% of cases the orientation is different. Look at Jason and Jarron Collins, for example.

3. “Being gay is just like being black”. Wrong. The two things have nothing in common. Homosexuality is a behaviour, being black is not. They are different sorts of category, so the same arguments just don't apply. Homosexuals have never been oppressed or enslaved like black people were in America. There has never been any special tax on them. They have never (unlike women and poor people) been excluded from education, the professions or voting. They have never been barred from beaches, bars, restaurants, schools or buses just for being homosexual. They have never been forced to live in ghettos. They are usually to be found in the most privileged classes of society. The penalties for sodomy always applied to heterosexuals as well.
4. “Homosexuals are oppressed, bullied and victimized all over the world”. Wrong. Most of the gay-bullying reports or claims of homosexuals murdered by “homophobes” are frauds or misrepresentations, like the cases of David Kato and Matthew Shepard. 

Homosexuals fake “hate-crimes” endlessly all over the world and most shamefully, they try to get heterosexuals convicted of these fake crimes. There are hundreds of examples and indexes available of the accumulated evidence.…/07/women-faked-hate-crime-jury-ru…
Most of the real bullying is done by homosexuals to other people or to themselves. They have appalling statistics of mutual harm and self-abuse. Who says so? Well, in their saner moments they admit it themselves.
I call this the Joe Orton syndrome.
5. “The gay lifestyle is safe. AIDS is not a gay problem”. False. These denials are disingenuous. Just go and read the statistics on the websites of the NHS, the CDCP, and European equivalents. Just read the public statements made by the UK Public Health Officer. The health risks of the homosexual lifestyle are very high and very serious. They cannot easily be dealt with by antibiotics or just using a condom. Male homosexuals are 28 times more likely to get AIDS than normal heterosexuals, and there is no cure. Lesbians injure each other with fisting and such dangerous practices. They have high rates of cancer. Homosexuals have a significantly shorter life expectancy than heterosexuals.

6. “There is no connection between homosexuality and paedophilia”. Oh yes there is. All the leaders and founders of the LGBT movement have always been paedophiles. Most of them still are. Brinkin, Kramer, Bean, and co are following in the footsteps of Harry Hay, David Thorstad, Tom O'Carroll, Peter Ashman, Gore Vidal and Rudiger Lautmann.

 A very high proportion of all CSA victims world-wide are boys molested by homosexuals. The entire LGBT movement has always been a paedophile movement and out of the 30 pro-paedophile groups campaigning in Europe, 28 are founded and run by homosexuals. Massive homosexual child-porn rings and boy-prostitution rackets are constantly being found by police all over the world. A high proportion of the famous homosexuals held up as “gay icons” were paedophiles.

                                    Frank Lombard

7. “The Nazis exterminated 100,000 homosexuals along with the Jews.” False. They exterminated 6 million Jews, some of whom were homosexual – that is all. The Nazis never actually passed any laws against homosexuality. The German police and courts under the Nazis continued to enforce old laws against male homosexuality from the nineteenth century. For a small minority this involved a limited time sentence in a labour camp. None were sentenced to death. They came out alive at the end of the war. 
Gad Beck  - held up as a "gay" martyr, he was actually Jewish and survived his brief internment

There were far more homosexuals in the SS and the Nazi top brass than in the camps.
8. “The Christian Churches used to perform same-sex unions in the middle ages”. This is a complete fallacy. It derives from a book by John Boswell which is unreliable. Most “gay” history is fantasy. Another myth that goes hand in hand with this one is "The American natives regarded homosexuality as normal or even special." False. In fact, out of hundreds of North American native tribes, only one or two small ones were tolerant of homosexuality or esteemed it in their culture. The vast majority regarded it as abnormal, unlucky or shameful, and they still do. In fact they have defied the USA court decisions to legalise same-sex "marriage" and publicly announced that they will not recognize it. Since they are legally separate nations, not part of the USA, the US courts have no power to dictate to them.…/11-native-american-tribes-including-tw…?
9. “Homosexuality was regarded as perfectly normal in ancient Greece and Rome, and homosexual unions were even more highly esteemed than heterosexual ones.” False. In fact there were more than fifty different Greek city-states with various laws, and in most of them, including Athens, sodomy between free-born males was illegal. In many parts of Greece homosexuality was outlawed, ridiculed or regarded with pity. Even in Sparta (not a place of great cultural achievement) where homosexuality between older men and boys was encouraged, it was never equated with marriage. Men of the same age did not have relationships with each other. The Greek goddess of love, Aphrodite, is heterosexual...of course.

The Trojan war was fought for a runaway wife - not over a homosexual squabble.
10. Being a “homophobe” is a sure sign of being a repressed homosexual". Rubbish. That is about as logical as claiming that if you don’t like and applaud drug-abuse (which is very widespread among homosexuals) you must be a secret drug-addict. Actually there is no such thing as “homophobia”. It is fraudulent pseudo-scientific term. Morality is not a phobia. Research is not a phobia. Health awareness is not a phobia. The term "homophobia" should be avoided in schools and universities as it encourages a fallacy and silences intellectual debate.
Heteronormativity is rational, logical and intelligent. To dispute it is silly and ignorant. That's what this prominent lesbian activist says too!

Thursday, 24 September 2015

Why Do We Have Secret Courts?

The scandal of secret court hearings in Britain continues, and Social Services use them to persecute families and tear them apart. It does not matter that nobody in these families has actually broken any law. Nor have they complained, or asked for help on any grounds. They are are not getting divorced, which might be a cue for the intervention of the dreaded CAFCASS whose name is a byword for insensitivity and idiocy. (CafCRASS you might call them).

No, even if you don't fall into any of those categories, Social Services, known as the SS, can still pick on you, disapprove of you, find fault with the way you bring up your children, particularly if you home-school them, and get a court order for the children to be taken away and forcibly adopted. The SS is 97% likely to win any court battle as it has almost unlimited resources, and can hire barristers and so-called "experts" to tear their victims apart, while for the average or poor family the difficulties and costs of a legal battle are immense. Only 3% of people win a case against Social Services.

If you imagine that Social Services separates children from their parents "for their own good", stop and look at the stark financial facts. Fostering agencies, such as Core Assets, get substantial fees from the government and ‘help’ towards meeting adoption targets [1]. The current figure is £27,000 per child. And if you doubt that the business is profitable, ask yourself why the National Fostering Agency was sold to American buyers in 2011 for £130 million!!!! [3]
The legislation behind this, is the Children, Family and Adoption Act,which was intended to get children out of council-run care homes. But to meet their targets, and increase their profits, the SS takes away children from their parents. They favour those who are easy to adopt i.e. very young, white, healthy and preferably good-looking. This now happens in about 1,500 families a year in the UK, so that SS Departments can meet their targets and push a tidy profit in the direction of the adoption agencies (often run by their associates).
These are not like the old Christian adoption charities (all closed down by LGBT fanatics). These are more like human- trafficking businesses.
And within SS circles there is a tendency to pick on Christian families as they conflict with notions of "political correctness".
While trying to prove such people are bad parents, the SS is completely oblivious to the harm done by their own protracted harassment, abuse and persecution of the families, which sometimes goes on for years. Of course these are the same "SS" types who ignored real abuse where it was going on in places such as Rotherham.
I heard of one recent example of a family with four children, snooped on, interrogated and bullied for eighteen months by the SS, who were looking for a pretext to confiscate their offspring. One day they arrived with a policeman to arrest the mother and father in front of these young children, putting them in handcuffs and giving no reason at all for their arrest, There were no charges because no law had been broken. The parents were put in a police car and driven away, the children taken away and put into council care, even though they have grandparents who are willing to look after them. The father, who tried to resist, was roughed up by the policeman.
The parents were locked up in police cells for over thirty hours, without charges or legal representation, As a result, the mother who was pregnant again, suffered a miscarriage. They are now in misery and terror, fearing the court decision for their children to be legally adopted which will mean none of them see each other again.
Anybody who names this family or gives any hint of their identity can be found guilty of contempt of court.
This country is not a democracy while such things happen. There is a war on Christians and there is a war on the family. Watch out, those of you who come into both suspect categories.