Wednesday, 27 November 2013

Conservative Councillor Charged with Stealing £150,000 from Oxfordshire Widow

A Conservative councillor in Oxfordshire, John Morgan, is on trial in Oxford Crown court on charges of swindling a 90-year-old woman out of £154,000. He left her so penniless that she had to have a pauper's funeral.

Claims: Conservative councillor John Morgan is alleged to have stolen the life savings of pensioner Beryl Gittens, who suffered from Alzheimer's disease

Moral bankruptcy and financial bankruptcy....that is all that the old parties offer to you the voters of Britain.
Morgan has been on the Vale of White Horse District Council for 25 years. He had power of attorney over the assets of Mrs Beryl Gittens, who was living in a care home in Wantage. Morgan transferred £75,000 directly to his bank account and took out another £80,000 in cash, then spent it on gambling. He had a taste for gambling on fruit machines and expensive trips to Las Vegas.
    Faced with documentary evidence, Morgan admits taking the money, but claims that Mrs Gittens wanted him to spend the money to prevent it going to her in-laws.
Do not trust any member of any of the old political parties when you cast your vote next year in the May elections. They are all a bunch of thieves.
http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/10846404.Councillor_accused_of_theft_denies_being_a_liar/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2513867/Tory-councillor-John-Morgan-gambled-away-womans-life-savings.html
http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/yourtown/wantage/10278487.Councillor_accused_of_stealing___154_000_from_OAP/


Feel Free to Annoy Me

DEFEND FREEDOM OF SPEECH...again

New campaign launched today -
"Feel free to annoy me!"


Simon Calvert writes:-
Reform Section 5 is transforming into Reform Clause 1.
The same team who campaigned for the right to be insulted is
now campaigning for the right to be annoyed!

The new Anti-social Behaviour Bill plans to replace ASBOs
with IPNAs: Injunctions to Prevent Nuisance or Annoyance.
The name alone should be enough to make any sensible person
run a mile.

Admittedly, you cannot be arrested or jailed just for being
annoying. The police or local authority must first apply to
a court. But if a court grants an IPNA against you, and you
breach it, you can be subject to contempt of court
proceedings.

The "nuisance or annoyance" test is borrowed from other
areas of law where it is much more tightly constrained.
Applying it to the public square will be disastrous. It
doesn't take much imagination to predict how it could be
used against protesters and other inconvenient
truth-tellers.

We are hoping for a vote in the House of Lords to try to
tone down anti-annoyance orders. We'll let you know more in
due course.


According to rumours, the change to Public Order law that
you helped win should come into force in January 2014.

The Crime and Courts Act became law in April. Thanks to
RS5ers like you, Section 57 of that Act removes "insulting
words" from the scope of Section 5.

It won't come into force until new guidance for police has
been finalised. RS5 was invited to review the guidance and
we secured useful improvements highlighting free speech.

Still, we are frustrated with the delay in bringing the
reform into force. You might like to encourage your MP to
co-sign this Early Day Motion (a kind of petition of MPs)
calling on the Home Office to get on with it:
http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2013-14/680

In the meantime,
- Visit reformclause1.org.uk to read more about the campaign.

- Follow the campaign on Facebook
(https://www.facebook.com/reformclause1) and Twitter
(https://twitter.com/reformclause1) and  let people know using
#feelfreetoannoyme

The next email you receive from us will come from
reformclause1.org.uk. Make sure you add us to your address
book to stop spam filters. If you no longer want to receive
any emails from us, please opt out by emailing
admin@reformsection5.org.uk with the subject "Opt me out from Reform
Clause 1".

Yours annoyingly,

Simon Calvert,
Campaign Director,
Reform Section 5
83 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0HW


Monday, 25 November 2013

International Day for the Ending of Violence Against Women

Today is the UN's International Day for the Ending of Violence Against Women.
Will we need one next year? I hope not. I hope it will have worked by then.
In support of this day I am posting here a poem by a friend of mine written about the rape victim in India whose tragic death after such a vicious attack caused an outcry last year.
Nirvaya

Do not ask if I dare to dream
of a land where I can walk free, without fear,
the sacrifices made to flicker in that flame
of hope; did not know the price would be so dear.
Life is a gift, I thought, did not expect
it to be cheap, callously plucked – half-chewed
bones tossed drunkenly after the feast.
In the night of the splintering womb
my dreams turned into nightmares.
No mountain could carry my grief, no ocean
wash away my shame, no wind dry my tears.
Do not ask how many times I touched the heart
of grief prised open like a pomegranate
my seeds spilling like rubies.
Battered and broken, no hope of being mended,
my sorrow speaks in myriad voices, will not be silenced
till the sacrilege of rape and violence is atoned.
How long must we suffer, burn like incense,
hold on to faith, dreaming of change?
We have an entire universe to rearrange.
After centuries of dreaming we are awake, alive,
know what holds us together when things fall away.
As long as I can summon the strength to pick myself
up when cast in the gutter, and my hopes can rise like a phoenix
I’ll let the universe know it does not exist without my dreams!

                                                                           Shanta Acharya
                                                                                                        From Asia Literary Review

This poem was inspired by the death of Jyoti Singh Pandey who was gang-raped in a bus in Delhi on 16 December 2012. She later died in a hospital in Singapore, where she was sent for treatment by the Indian authorities. According to Indian law, because she was a rape victim, her name was initially not publicly disclosed, even after her death. The Indian media called the 23 year-old woman Nirvaya, the fearless one. It was her father, Badrinath Singh, who revealed her name. He wanted the world to know who she was. 


Sunday, 24 November 2013

You Can't Heat Your House - but MPs claim for their Stables

Anybody who thinks the Parliamentary expenses scandal is all over must think again. Millionaire Conservative MP Nadhim Zahawi did his best to revive it by claiming £5,822 on his expenses to heat the stables at his second home.  Zahawi, who is MP for Stratford-on-Avon, also claimed for a host of petty amounts including 53p to buy a hole punch, 63p for ballpoint pens and 89p for a stapler. No amount is too big or too small for this grasping Tory,  often photographed at David Cameron's side.

Writing from his £1 million 31-acre estate in Stratford, he apologized on his blog and claimed that it was all due to an oversight.  Benefit cheats get sent to gaol, but with Zahawi the "David Laws" law seems to operate. No steps are being taken against him. 


Until this awkward little bit of exposure, Mr Zahawi was chairing meetings on fuel shortages for vulnerable families! How very caring of him. Some of them might like to move into his stables. Age UK, Barnardo’s and Consumer Futures all agree that fuel poverty is on the rise in the UK as energy bills have just jumped 10% in one year and incomes, like people's fingers and toes, are frozen. Last winter, thousands of old people died of the cold or cold-related illnesses. Even if you regard with caution the more extreme claims about us being comparable with Estonia, there is certainly no doubt that the problem of people living in fuel poverty in the UK this winter will be WORSE than last. 


 http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/nadhim-zahawi-dropped-chairing-meeting-6328658

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/every-little-helps-nadhim-zahawi-mp-who-claimed-most-on-energy-bills-also-received-31p-for-paperclips-8932548.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/household-bills/10402771/UK-second-only-to-Estonia-on-fuel-poverty.html

Saturday, 23 November 2013

Is Paul Flowers the Worst Labour Monster ever?

So the Co-operative Bank, offshoot and mainstay of the Labour Party, has gone bankrupt with a debt of £1.5 billion, after years of gross mismanagement. It has been run with such spectacular ignorance and negligence that you are hardly surprised to find that the culprit, Paul Flowers, is a class A drug-abuser.



He is also a prominent member of the Labour party, one of Ed Miliband's personal cronies, a promiscuous homosexual once convicted of "gross indecency" in a public toilet, a disgraced former Labour councillor who was found with hard-core porn on his computer and ...a Methodist minister!! He had no qualifications whatsoever when he was elected to be director of the Co-op Bank. All he had was his politically-correct credentials.
Labour party member. Tick!
Gay-friendly - very. Tick!
Could talk a lot of codswallop about "equality" "ethical banking" and "Green energy". Tick...

>>>What does this tell you about what is wrong with our society?  It tells us that we should be worrying not only about our financial bankruptcy, but about our moral bankruptcy. Paul Flowers was politically correct...and ethically corrupt. 
Nobody accused of being a "homophobe" could possibly get a job nowadays at any level  - but a totally incompetent socialist junkie with a depraved lifestyle could be elected to the top post in the Co-op Bank, and appointed by Ed Miliband as a member of the Labour Party's Financial and Industrial Advisory Board.
The Libdems are keen to defend him too. Lib Dem MP Mark Oaten defended Flowers by saying that although he had hired two rent boys to perform ‘acts too disgusting to be described in a family newspaper’, he had only done so "because he was worried about losing his hair".
Flowers was sneaked on to the Daily Mail by a male prostitute he met via Grindr, the gay-pick-up-mobile-phone-app. Shows such apps have got their uses...
Flowers was taking rent-boys to parties held by Baroness Thornton, the Labour peer who pushed "gay" marriage through the House of Lords. We have lost our moral compass well and truly.
Can't you just hear all the lefties chorusing "His sexuality is irrelevant to this scandal..." Well not really. The revelations about Flowers are consistent about what is known about the homosexual lifestyle in general. He is not a one-off, he is typical, and this should be a warning never to accept the homosexual lifestyle as fully "normal". It is not.

An icon of our time
 by Melanie Phillips, The Spectator 23 November 2013
Paul Flowers: Yet again, one particular question has formed on lips up and down the land. How in heaven’s name could so many people have failed to spot such a spectacular abuse of a public position?
How the 'crystal Methodist' got away with it.
We heard it first in the Jimmy Savile scandal, when the posthumous discovery of half a century of predation left people incredulous that so many had known about but done nothing to stop his serial depravities. Now a similar question needs to be asked about the Revd Paul Flowers, the disgraced Methodist minister and former chairman of the Co-op Bank who was filmed apparently handing over £300 to buy a stash of cocaine and crystal meth and also boasted of using ketamine, cannabis and a club drug, GHB.
[This so-called "date-rape" drug is widely used in homosexual circles, and makes people pliant and receptive. It  can also cause sudden unexplained death and it is suspected to have been used in the case of Robert Fleeting.]
The real scandal, though, is not just that he was a staggeringly incompetent bank chief who knew next to nothing about banking and presided over a bank that somehow fell into a £1.5 billion black hole. It is not even his predilection for cocaine, crystal meth and the occasional ‘two-day, drug-fuelled gay orgy’ (to use his words). The scandal is that no one spotted that he was spectacularly unsuited to the jobs he was given — or if they did, they chose to do nothing about it. Yet again, a public figure with his ethics pinned to his sleeve somehow existed beyond proper scrutiny.
In the frame alongside the deeply un-fragrant Flowers are various institutions which now have questions to answer. The Co-op Bank, which elected him chairman. The Labour party, which banked his donations. Ed Miliband, who dined with him and appointed him to Labour’s financial and industrial advisory board. And the Methodist Church, which appointed him a ‘superintendent’ minister and designated him a trustee for its investment funds and property — even though he had next to no expertise in business.
Oh — and he has also been a member of the Advertising Standards Authority, vice-chairman of the National Association of Citizens’ Advice Bureaux and chairman of Manchester Camerata, the city’s chamber orchestra, not to mention chairman of the drug abuse charity Lifeline and the Terrence Higgins Trust. He is an icon of our time.
So how come none of these bodies ever spotted his spectacular unsuitability to be a member of the Great and the Good?
His striking unfitness to advise anyone on economic matters was demonstrated at the Treasury select committee earlier this month. Asked to state the Co-op Bank’s total assets, he guessed £3 billion; it was actually £47 billion. His performance may well have caused onlookers to scratch their heads and ask themselves: just what exotic substances is he on?
It turns out that he was indeed on drugs, even if not on that precise occasion. But it has become increasingly clear that the rise of the Revd Paul Flowers was not due to any banking expertise — which comprised a mere four years’ employment at NatWest, which he had joined at the tender age of 19.
No, his rise was due to his political connections. He was appointed chairman by the Co-op Bank’s Remuneration and Appointments Committee, which is composed largely of former Labour politicians and Co-op veterans. Jobs for the boys, in other words — or, as Flowers put it, the Co-op ‘had a practice of appointing a democrat from within its own numbers as the chair of that board’. From which we may infer that fitness for office was a synonym for mutual political back-scratching.
Indeed the Co-op Group, of which Flowers was a director, has underwritten the Labour party by some £34 million over the past two decades. The last £1.2 million loan was agreed in April, a month after Miliband met Flowers in the Commons. Even now, about 30 Labour MPs describe themselves as ‘Labour and Co-operative’ — including Ed Balls, the shadow chancellor.
The Co-op was hymned by Eds Miliband and Balls for its qualities of stewardship and responsibility, and proclaimed an ‘ethical’ bank — as opposed to all those other supposedly predatory casino banks. This seemed to give rise to the belief that the sole criteria for management was being holier-than-thou about money. But piety is no substitute for financial competence — as was demonstrated during the Co-op’s calamitous acquisition of the Britannia Building Society.
We knew that deal was a disaster which was to force the Co-op to seek a bailout. What we did not know, until Flowers admitted it to the Treasury select committee this month, was that the bank was egged on to do the deal by Ed Balls when he was part of Gordon Brown’s government, and that he was ‘very supportive of the whole process’. That support turned out to be mutual: Flowers later oversaw a £50,000 donation of Co-op Group money to Balls’s private office in March last year. ‘We believe in supporting political friends,’ he said later.
It’s amazing how far such friendships can take you in certain circles. The Labour party stayed friendly with Flowers even after his abrupt departure from Bradford Council (‘inappropriate but not illegal adult content’ had been found on his computer). Friendships seem to have elevated the laughably unqualified Flowers to the chairmanship of the Co-op Bank. The Financial Services Authority was supposed to watch out for all this mutual back-scratching — but instead it joined in. Graeme Hardie, one of the FSA’s ‘grey panthers’ who assessed Flowers’s fitness to chair the Co-op Bank, went on become a director at that bank.
The full extent of this seems to be beginning to dawn even on the Co-operative Group. Len Wardle, its chairman who oversaw Flowers’s recruitment, this week apologised and resigned — recognising the true nature of the scandal which, he said, ‘raised a number of serious questions for both the bank and the group’.
Now, surely, we are getting closer to the deeper reason why Flowers got away with it.  If people knew or suspected his inadequacies when promoting him, they didn’t care because he ticked all the right boxes of what has become the Unchallengeable Consensus of Virtue — even one that turns out to be rotten to the core.Competence and rigour come a poor second to being mates in a cosy cartel devoted to the cause. It’s all about striking an attitude which proclaims your goodness through a series of fashionable shibboleths. This makes you all but invulnerable, because anyone who challenges that attitude is inescapably portrayed as wicked, stupid or bonkers.
An article written by Flowers about the Co-op, entitled ‘Capturing the Ethical Opportunity’, read as if he had simply ticked off every such shibboleth he could think of. The Co-op ran ‘the UK’s most radical ethical operating plan’. Tick! It was against ‘ corporate greed and speculation’, promoting instead ‘sustainability’ based on an ‘inclusive and socially responsible approach to business’. Tick! Tick! ‘Green Schools’! ‘Healthy food’! ‘Fairtrade’! Tick! Tick! Tick! Thus Flowers created his own mythology, modestly describing himself on the Methodist Church’s website as ‘known for an objective rigour and for asking the questions others might avoid’.
So what about all those drugs and orgies? The behaviour which even his former rent boy described as ‘debauched’? How could a man with such predilections have got away with being a Methodist minister for 40 years? Flowers claims the pressures of his Co-op role and a family bereavement drove him to do things that were ‘stupid and wrong’. But it emerges that, back in 1981, he was fined for committing an act of gross indecency in a public toilet. The Methodist Church decided he could continue as a minister because he was ‘very contrite’.
In other words, it’s not that no one knew what he was up to. Some did indeed know — but chose to ignore it. That’s why a Labour MP who passed Flowers in the corridor apparently joked, ‘Have you got a touch of the old Colombian flu?’ It would seem that his drug-taking was a laughing matter amongst his ‘friends’. As for the Lifeline drugs charity he chaired, this takes such a liberal position that its literature effectively normalises drug use through manuals on how to use drugs ‘safely’.
And now people are shocked that the former chairman of Lifeline turns out to be a rampant drug abuser. Then the Methodists get all judgmental and suspend him for three weeks. Tough, huh? Especially when you consider what they say on their website about drug abusers, that ‘judgmental attitudes are wholly inappropriate’. Even the Methodists are in hock to liberal pieties.
Incompetence, recklessness, irresponsibility, criminality, decadence — these are all faults found in others, never in you and your cronies. Because you are inclusive, diverse, green, ethical, compassionate, progressive, devoted to equality and above all non-judgmental — except of course when it comes to the Tories, or anyone who wants to enforce the law against illegal drugs.
And so you are invulnerable. As long as you tick all the right ‘progressive’ boxes, you can get away with anything until someone comes along with a secret camera. And so we got the Revd Paul Flowers, Britain’s first crystal Methodist.

  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2509588/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-Lets-hear-Crystal-Methodist-Why-tonight-Flowers-portrayed-hapless-victim-evil-newspaper.html#ixzz2lUhpsWut 


Wednesday, 20 November 2013

Horrible Histories...Why We Don't Need "Gay" History Month

"In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell 

Pedophiles and persecutors are held up as role-models for British schoolchildren, thanks to "Gay" History Month.
You may know that UK education is bad, but you have no idea just how terrible it is until you have looked on the "Gay" History Month website. Written by idiots, with the morals of a low-grade porn film, this site offers materials to be used in teaching children aged 5 up to 16 in all our British schools.
       It is shoddy, crude and utterly crass.  And curiously enough, the LGBTs who hotly deny that homosexuals are ever, to any extent, pedophiles have, throughout their own website, included pedophiles as "gays", and make no distinction between the two categories. This confirms that they do indeed have a very worrying overlap and a tendency to converge.
      For 2014, Benjamin Britten is selected as a "gay icon" to be held up to children as a role-model. If you look a little further than this website for your facts, the biography Britten's Children  by John Bridcut makes it clear that Britten was in love with a succession of boys, many of them as young as 13, all his life. One of them, Harry Morris, complained that Britten made homosexual advances to him when he was 13. Others were invited to sleep in his bed or went with him swimming naked at midnight.  Because few complained, we can only guess how far this went but Britten certainly did not confine himself to a long-term relationship with another adult male. And he has been explicitly named as one of the customers of the boy-procurement service run by the Kray twins in London in the 1960s.
http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/p-i-e/paedophile-ring-link-to-no10-to-be-investigated/35147-2/
Very nice icon for the rising generation to be taught to admire uncritically! Why not throw in the Kray twins as well? They were queer too. Why aren't they right up there with all the other "gay icons"?
Pedophile Allen Ginsberg is featured on the LGBT website, author of the tasteful little poem, "Sweet Boy, Give Me Your Ass." Ginsberg used to display films of himself masturbating over pictures of little lads.
http://lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/featured-right/daniel-radcliffe-on-homophobia-kill-your-darlings/
Any objection is categorized as ...you've guessed, homophobia!
Harry Hay is there, described as a "pioneer of gay liberation". Yeah, he was also a lifelong member of NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association, which marched on all the USA Gay Parades for the first twenty years. It is hand in glove with the LGBT movement. They should really call themselves LGBTP  - Lesbian, Gay, Bisesexual, Transexual and PEDOPHILE.
http://www.lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/calendar/Archive_2008/LGBT%20History%20Month%20Events.php?recordID=378
Franklin Kameny is there, that pioneer of gay rights and another supporter of NAMBLA. He was their public speaker at a meeting in 1981. He also publicly defended bestiality and wrote "Let's have all the perversions, more and better perversions."
W.H. Auden is included over and over again. A self-confessed pedophile, he made no secret of the fact that he hired boys in German and American brothels.
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/11/04/books/the-boys-in-berlin-auden-s-secret-poems.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
Freddie Mercury is featured as a "gay" icon - the singer who died of AIDS after a life of wild promiscuity. Because children need role-models (sic).
There are many proud references on the LGBT History Month website to Leonardo da Vinci. Shame they keep getting him muddled up with Michelangelo. One contributor burbles mindlessly that Leonardo created the famous "hyper-homo-David" [sic].  Look guys, Leonardo was the one with the beard, who wrote notebooks. Michelangelo was the one with the broken nose, who wrote poems - got it?
http://lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/featured-right/homophobias-still-going-strong-in-21st-century-comedy/
They boast about him rather briefly in Bulletin 29,
"1452 Leonardo da Vinci born 555 years ago. Italian artist and scientist"  - and that's all. Yeah, just "artist and scientist" then they rush on to Virginia Woolf who is described as "Foremost writer in the ‘modernist’ cannon" [sic and there is no mention of Mr Leonard Woolf either].
Leonardo gets another glowing accolade in the document "Anti-Bullying Campaign Form Time Activities"....
www.lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/documents/FormTimeActivities.doc
And there he is again in the Power Point Presentation "LGBT Pioneers in STEM"
The lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans people who impacted on science, technology, maths and science and who helped change the world ...
Leonardo, described as "Genius" in his career description, is right up there.
Let's make this clear  - if the rumours about Leonardo da Vinci are to be believed at all, then he was a pedophile. He was first accused of the crime of Sodom in 1476 when he was aged 24. There is no absolute necessity to believe it but you cannot separate the homosexuality from the pederasty. Contemporaries gossiped about him having relations with one of his apprentices, Salai, a boy aged ten [which is somewhat older than the pupils for whom these teaching materials are designed.]
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_life_of_Leonardo_da_Vinci

Along with the pedophiles LGBT History Month features famous Nazis such as Ernst Rohm (an inveterate pederast) and such lovable characters as the Roman Emperor Hadrian....Yes, people who cannot even spell the word emperor are holding up this man, one of the worst persecutors of the ancient world, as a hero, because he was "gay".

http://lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/history/lgbt-people/biographies/emporer-hadrian/ [sic]

Our glorious gay-edjercators tell children that "Hadrian had Antinous brought in as a ‘house-boy’. His age at the time is a matter of some conjecture but he was probably below the legal age of consent that exists today." In other words, Hadrian was a pedophile, but's that's OK. This pedophile "had a reputation for being affable and doing things by the rule-book."  Well, that's not what it says in the Jewish Encyclopaedia. It says that he set out to eradicate the Jews from the Roman Empire and his troops at Alexandria massacred fifty thousand of them in a single day. He then tore down the temple in Jerusalem and put a statue of himself there instead.
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/7015-hadrian
This pogrom has been described as the "first Holocaust". [Er, what was that about an anti-bullying campaign?...]

HADRIAN:Roman emperor (117-138). At the very beginning of his reign he was called upon to suppress the final outbreaks of Jewish rebellion at Cyrene and Alexandria. According to a late but trustworthy source, he is said to have enticed the Jews of Alexandria into the open country, where about 50,000 of them were killed by his soldiers (Eliyahu R. xxx. 3). ... The temple of Jupiter towered on the site of the ancient Temple, with a statue of Hadrian in the interior (Jerome, Comm. on Isaiah ii. 9). The Jews now passed through a period of bitter persecution; Sabbaths, festivals, the study of the Torah, and circumcision were interdicted, and it seemed as if Hadrian desired to annihilate the Jewish people. His anger fell upon all the Jews of his empire, for he imposed upon them an oppressive poll-tax (Appian, "Syrian War," § 50). After this the Jews did not hold Hadrian's memory in high honor; the Talmud and Midrash follow his name with the curse "Crush his bones." His reign is called the time of persecution and danger, and the blood of many martyrs is charged to his account.  (Gen. R. lxiii. 7).

 There is no limit to the crass, abysmal ignorance of "Gay" History Month. Such a level of illiteracy would be disgraceful even in the pupils, let alone in the so-called teachers and those who design the teaching materials. Shovelling patiently through the chaos of the GHM site we come to a selection of cheery games such as word-searches and quizzes designed to promote and glorify homosexuality in all its forms  - including fake.
Here we have a quiz page to be used for school pupils. Learning should be fun, fun fun!
http://lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/quizzes/

Picture Quiz
Famous people who have had a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or Transgender identity ascribed to them...even if it wasn't true.
How many can you name from their pictures?
1. Florence Nightingale – founder of modern nursing. [Rubbish: Florence Nightingale was not a homosexual. The most recent  - and thorough  - biography of Florence Nightingale is by Mark Bostridge.  On the subject of "the idea of Florence Nightingale as a lesbian" he comments crisply, "There's no evidence for that!" Florence Nightingale: The Woman and her Legend by Mark Bostridge. pub. Viking 2008 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/florence-nightingale-a-new-biography-sheds-light-on-the-lady-with-the-lamp-942339.html ]

2. Noel Coward – actor, composer, playwright, cabaret artist.
3. Bessie smith – blues singer.
4. Boy George – singer, songwriter, dj. [ Really?  I had heard that he might be an infamous thug and drug-addict with a string of convictions for narcotic-abuse, assault and criminal behaviour.]
5. Nadia Almada – trans winner of Big Brother.
6. James Baldwin – writer, civil rights activist.
7. Dusty Springfield – singer.
8. William Shakespeare – poet and playwright. [ Crude and amateur criticism of the worst kind. Shakespeare's sonnets make it clear that his relationship with the young man was not physical and even W.H. Auden has written to the same effect  - that the ideas and emotions expressed in them are far from those experienced by a homosexual. But children who know nothing about Shakespeare and will never read a single one of his plays are being fed  this preconception.]
9. Will Young – singer.[would you call him that?]
10. Plato – philosopher. [They've got this wrong  - they surely mean Socrates?]
11. Jan Morris – trans travel writer and journalist.
12. k. d. lang – singer songwriter.
13. Vikram Seth – novelist.
14. Queen Anne – monarch.[Who actually had at least ten children. Whoops!]
15. Sir Ian McKellen – actor.
16. Cyril Nri – actor, director, writer – currently starring as Supt. Adam Okara in “The Bill”.
17. James Miranda Barry – Woman who posed as male throughout her life, became a doctor (when only men could) and married. Was only discovered to be female when her body was examined after death.[So what?]
18. Alice Walker – writer and activist.
19. Tinky Winky – a Teletubby.[Oh that's great, what a wonderful role-model and icon, a tele-tubby!!!]
20. Mark Sheehily – singer, member of Westlife.
21. Ellen Generes – actor, comedian.
22. Issac Newton – scientist. [YES THEY CAN'T EVEN SPELL HIS NAME and it is a complete myth that he was homosexual. If we consult this for example :-
http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/prism.php?id=40   From Isaac Newton's Personal Life
The Newton Project Professor Rob Iliffe  Director, AHRC Newton Papers Project.Scott Mandelbrote, Fellow & Perne librarian, Peterhouse, Cambridge University of Sussex, East Sussex - BN1 9SH - newtonproject@sussex.ac.uk
"It has also been suggested - though this is purely conjectural and much disputed - that he was a repressed homosexual, which if true would undoubtedly have placed a man of his background and upbringing under extreme mental strain."
Although "Even in his maturity, having become rich, famous, laden with honours and internationally acclaimed as one of the world's foremost thinkers, he remained deeply insecure, given to fits of depression and outbursts of violent temper, and implacable in pursuit of anyone by whom he felt threatened....
Well yes, that certainly does sound like a lot of "gay" people we know but it's not conclusive evidence, is it?...]

http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/8017/was-sir-isaac-newton-a-homosexual
What evidence is there to support the claim that Newton was a homosexual? Referring to the book Sir Isaac Newton: Brilliant Mathematician and Scientist, by Natalie M. Rosinsky, it tells us "[Isaac Newton] spent almost all of 1689 in London [...] At that time, Newton began what was possibly the strongest personal relationship of his life. It was with a young Swiss mathematician named Nicolas Fatio de Duillier [...] While there is no proof that either man was homosexual, their letters suggest that their affection for one another was romantic."  [ Which is of course very different  from following the lifestyle referred to so inaptly as "gay".]

http://sex.omg-facts.com/Sex+Facts/Isaac-Newton-Died-A-Virgin/58027
 Isaac Newton stated on his deathbed that he was a virgin. He said this to the doctor attending him and Voltaire who knew him well testified to it. 
Imagine if today's schoolchildren were taught about Great Men and Women who Died Virgins. What kind of impact would that have on their minds  - and on their priorities?

I had to laugh when I read this about Michelangelo: "So why is he a gay icon? He maintained his sexuality despite his deeply pious religious beliefs. He was 57 when he fell in love with Tommaso ‘de Cavalieri but they stayed together until his death at 59." Yes, that's right! A whole two years!
Sorry to break the news but actually they never "stayed together" or even lived together. They met and wrote letters. That's all.
http://lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/.../michaelangelo-buonarotti/

Michelangelo did indeed have some very passionate feelings towards Tommaso de'Cavalieri (whose name the  LGBTs cannot even spell). But it was never a physical relationship, according to Vasari and all the detailed biographies. Michelangelo never opposed Cavalieri's marriage. Moreover, Michelangelo had a fourteen-year relationship with a woman, Vittoria Colonna, to whom he also wrote love letters and poems. Both relationships remained utterly chaste and Michelangelo lived a life of high principled self-restraint. It is simply wrong to portray him as "gay" with the sort of connotations that entails. By the way, Michelangelo did not die at the age of 59 either.

The LGBT curriculum asserts that gay children need "role-models". But science has proved conclusively that nobody is born gay and there is no gay gene, therefore there is no such thing as a "gay child". There is certainly no such thing as a "transsexual" child either. There are disturbed children, yes, and there will be more as a result of this agenda.

Suggested texts for young children include  Bill’s New Frock ...
"Bill wakes up one morning to discover that he has become a girl. That day at school he discovers that people can make all sorts of assumptions about you because of what sex you are – or even just how you look. ...."
This is gross indoctrination. It will confuse children and make them worry in case they can suddenly change sex. It is meant to make them regard transsexualism as normal - but of course it isn't. Remember this is being pushed at young kids, aged 5 upwards!
      The LGBT agenda involves teaching them a central core of lies e.g.the belief that homosexuality is genetic and innate, or that people can be "born in the wrong body". Science can easily disprove these assertions but science is increasingly banned from the classroom in favour of so-called "gay rights". Eight independent scientific studies carried out all over the world prove conclusively that nobody is born homosexual :-

http://www.hollanddavis.com/?p=3647

And if, as these LGBT people say, orientation is innate, then logically there would be no need to teach it would there?
     The impact of the indoctrination is many sided. One outcome is the rocketing number of young people now demanding sex-change treatments even surgery, which is frequently the start of a lifetime of misery. Sex cannot be changed. Unlike orientation, it is genetic and innate, therefore fixed. Superficial tampering is just mutilation.
     The LGBT History month website includes a link to the original Gay Rights Manifesto of 1971, which demanded the legalisation of pedophilia, prostitution, soliciting and transexual silliness. It also offers a revised version that attacks the family as an oppressive institution.
"Monogamy is usually based on ownership - the woman sells her services to the man in return for security for herself and her children - and is entirely bound up in the man's idea of property furthermore in our society the monogamous couple, with or without children, is an isolated, shut-in, up-tight unit, suspicious of and hostile to outsiders. 
“ Yet although this struggle will be hard, [sic]and our victories not easily won [sob sob], we are not in fact being idealistic to aim at abolishing the family and the cultural distinctions between men and women. True, these have been with us throughout history, yet humanity is at last in a position where we can progress beyond this...."
Progress? No, just rubbish written by nasty, twisted crackpots.
          It is time for all those who care what is taught in our schools and why to stand up and publicly condemn this harmful nonsense. It is a disaster from every point of view. We should be teaching children about moral values and noble ideals, not to worship a pack of pedophiles.


Toolkits for primary and for secondary schools :-
http://lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/schools/lgbt-history-month-in-schools-toolkit/

http://americansfortruth.com/2007/05/21/gay-rights-icon-frank-kameny-spoke-at-nambla-meeting-in-1981/


NB Could anything make GHM worse? Yes   - it can.  I found that after opening four files on the website and downloading them to my computer, I got a severe virus. It slowed down to nearly stop and kept freezing.  I have run all sorts of scans and security procedures but,,,it is still crippled. I am now having to use an alternative machine. Be warned. The files were three quiz-files and a Power Point presentation called STEM.

Monday, 18 November 2013

Why Are Library Computers Censored?

Did you know that in Oxfordshire and most other counties public library systems are censored? This does not mean that you can't use them for browsing porn -  the weird thing is that many sites that might be considered "obscene" are accessible, while other sites for some obscure reason are not.
I wrote to my country councillors objecting to this and was told by the county librarians that the computer system has a fixed censorship filter on it installed by the makers, a firm called TrendMicro.

"Our policy is that all our computer users must agree to our acceptable user policy and agree that they will not create, access, copy, store, transmit or publish any material which is obscene, racist, defamatory or illegal, causes harassment or gross offence to others and would be a breach of copyright. Our underlying policy is that all computers, except for those dedicated to children’s use, provide uncensored access to the Internet.  However, OCC's ICT service dictates that we have sophisticated filtering software installed on our public computers which does in fact filter access to many extreme / illegal sites on all terminals. This does not conflict with our policy, as we are filtering only those extreme sites that users have explicitly agreed not to access.  PCs located in children's libraries are filtered, using basically the same filtering criteria as in primary schools.  The library computer web filtering is provided by TrendMicro, and it is they who categorise the websites and not the Library Service and to reiterate, our ICT service requires that this is installed."

But what are these supposedly "extreme" sites and when did users ever agree not to access them? Who says what is acceptable or immoral? Why are we not allowed to know the criteria and engage in discussion of the policy? Friends of mine, who are certainly adults, and using the computer access in the adult library, not the children's section, report that they cannot access Christian evangelical sites... but you can get into sites that teach you how to make a bomb. Nowadays, when children in school are encouraged to get their so-called sex education from porn sites, what criteria are left to apply?

 Who is to say what constitutes "gross offence"? Some people would call Othello racist and The Merchant of Venice  offensive to Jews. Are they censored? One headmistress decided that Jane Eyre was sexist  - is that censored? What is the sociological and political agenda behind this? The ICT service is paid by us, the public, to serve us, not to tell us what to do, what to read and what to think.  We should be treated as adults in a democracy, capable of making our own decisions,
       How can a website one person looks at be "grossly offensive to others" unless those others are peeping over your shoulder and snooping into what you read ? I think this censorship is unacceptable, and it must stop now. I am old enough to make up my own mind about moral issues and I don't need TrendMicro or the ICT team to do it for me.
    I have written to Lorraine Lindsay-Gale, the county councillor with a special responsibility for libraries, asking her about this and so far I have had no reply whatsoever. I suggest that others who also want to be treated as grown-up write to her and support this protest.

 lorraine.lindsay-gale@oxfordshire.gov.uk


Friday, 15 November 2013

EU Plans to Spy on Dissidents and Take Reprisals

It's like something out of 1984.
WE WILL NOT TOLERATE INTOLERANCE.
OUR VIEWS ARE TOLERANCE AND YOURS ARE "BIGOTRY"...

EU PROPOSAL TO MONITOR "INTOLERANT" CITIZENS.
 The following is excerpted from "EU Proposal," Gatestone Institute, Oct. 28, 2013:
"While European leaders are busy expressing public indignation over reports of American espionage operations in the European Union, the European Parliament is quietly considering a proposal that calls for the direct surveillance of any EU citizen suspected of being 'intolerant.' Critics say the measure--which seeks to force the national governments of all 28 EU member states to establish 'special administrative units' to monitor any individual or group expressing views that the self-appointed guardians of European multiculturalism deem to be 'intolerant'--represents an unparalleled threat to free speech in a Europe where citizens are already regularly punished for expressing the 'wrong' opinions, especially about Islam. ... After five years of lobbying in Europe's halls of power, the European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation (ECTR) proposal appears to be making headway, as evidenced by the European Parliament's recent decision to give the group a prominent 45-minute time slot to present its proposal to the Civil Liberties committee on September 17. Also known as the 'Model Statute for Tolerance,' the ECTR's proposal was presented as part of the EU's ongoing work towards a new 'Equal Treatment Directive' (ETD) that would vastly expand the scope of discrimination to all sectors of life in both the public and private spheres. ... According to European Dignity Watch, a civil rights watchdog based in Brussels, 'The principles of freedom of contract and the freedom to live according to one's personal moral views are in danger of being superseded by a newly developed concept of "equality." ... It is about governmental control of social behavior of citizens. These tendencies begin to give the impression of long-passed totalitarian ideas and constitute an unprecedented attack on citizens' rights. ... Faith-based groups and schools, adherents of a particular religion or even just parents who want to teach their children certain moral values would all be put under general suspicion of being intolerant,' according to European Dignity Watch."


 (Friday Church News Notes, November 15, 2013, www.wayoflife.org, fbns@wayoflife.org, 866-295-4143) -

Thursday, 14 November 2013

EU Tyranny Humiliates the Greeks

Not since the German occupation under the Nazis has Greece been so utterly trampled on. Every public corporation and asset has been closed down or seized by the tyranny of the EU. The right to free assembly has been withdrawn and anti-EU political parties have been ruthlessly outlawed and suppressed, under puppet prime minister Antonis Samaras.



In July the state broadcasting company ERT was officially closed to save money and all its 2,600 employees made redundant. Nothing brought back memories of the Nazis more than having their state TV and radio shut down. For five months, the employees occupied the building and heroically worked on, without pay. Reporters, producers, editors, assistants and technicians went on broadcasting five news bulletins per day and a range of other programmes. This week the EU-controlled government actually sent in armed police with tear-gas to forcibly take over the premises and evict all the last remaining staff.

A protester remonstrates with policemen as he tries to approach the headquarters of former state broadcaster ERT

Greece is in tatters. Pensions and salaries have been cut to a quarter of what they were. Many people are not getting paid at all, there is very little food in the shops and few people apart from the rich can afford to heat their homes or buy petrol for their cars. Schools and hospitals cannot afford heating or lighting. More and more homes are getting their water cut off, because of unpaid utility bills.
Greece is now a Third-World country  - thanks to the EU.
All this is happening in order to enforce the single currency. If Greece had never gone into the euro-zone, never sold its independence for short-term subsidies and apparent prosperity, it would not be in this shocking state. The only way out is for the Greeks to leave the euro currency and revert to their own drachma.
Next year the EU will be using the centenary of the Great War to send a message that EU unification is better than the continental wars of the 20th century, but the truth is that EU tyranny is very much like the continental wars of the 20th century. Greeks feel today just as they did in WW2 when they were invaded and controlled by the Nazis.

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/07/03/business/greeces-ert-remains-on-air-despite-closure-as-employees-revel-in-independence/#.UoSrl_nIb3Q

Wednesday, 13 November 2013

Atrocities Against Syrian Christians Continue



In the little Syrian town of Sadad in the Homs region, 160 km north of Damascus, all the Christian inhabitants who could fled last month at the approach of the Islamist rebels. 1,500 families were taken hostage, 45 people who resisted were killed and thirty bodies were tossed into one ditch.
After the village was retaken by the Syrian army, villagers who returned to their homes found it in a wrecked state and everywhere there was evidence of brutality and violence. Old and infirm people who had not been able to flee had been subjected to torture and strangulation. Entire families had been wiped out. Matanios El Sheikh, aged 85, his wife Habsah, aged 75, their daughter Njala aged 45, who had stayed as their carer, and their grandchildren Ranim, an 18-year old student, and his brother Fadi, aged 16, were all murdered along with Fadi's paternal grandmother, Mariam, aged 90. Their bodies were flung into a ditch.
 Every building in the village was pillaged and most of them destroyed   - churches, homes, shops, clinics, school and even the post office. And our British media remains silent...
     The BBC anti-christian bias has been noted in a recent article in The Commentator. The Centre for the Study of Global Christianity in Masachusetts USA reports that thousands of Christians every year are being killed for their faith world-wide. 



http://www.thecommentator.com/article/4356/liberal_left_bbc_minimises_christian_persecution

http://www.aleteia.org/fr/international/actualites/syrie-les-chretiens-de-sadad-ont-vecu-lhorreur-11924001

Monday, 11 November 2013

Homosexuals Say They Are Pedophiles: Official

"In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell 

Pedophiles and persecutors are held up as role-models for British children in the National Curriculum, thanks to "Gay" History Month.
You may know that UK education is bad, but you have no idea just how terrible it is until you have looked on the "Gay" History Month website. Written by ignorant, semi-literate morons, with the morals of a low-grade porn film, this site offers materials to be used in teaching children aged 5 up to 16 in all our British schools.
       It is shoddy, crude and utterly crass. To just laugh at its stupidity would be a mistake because this material is being energetically pushed at impressionable young people and is doing a lot of harm.
        Only one good thing can come out of this disaster  - the fact that the LGBTs have throughout the website included pedophiles as "gays", and make no distinction between the two categories, confirms that they do indeed have a very worrying overlap and a tendency to converge.
      For 2014, Benjamin Britten is selected as a "gay icon" to be held up to children as a role-model. If you look a little further than this website for your facts, the biography Britten's Children  by John Bridcut makes it clear that Britten was in love with a succession of boys, many of them as young as 13, all his life. One of them, Harry Morris, complained that Britten made homosexual advances to him when he was 13. Others were invited to sleep in his bed or went with him swimming naked at midnight.  Because few complained, we can only guess how far this went but Britten certainly did not confine himself to a long-term relationship with another adult male. And he has been explicitly named as one of the customers of the boy-procurement service run by the Kray twins in London in the 1960s.
http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/p-i-e/paedophile-ring-link-to-no10-to-be-investigated/35147-2/
Very nice icon for the rising generation to be taught to admire uncritically! Why not throw in the Kray twins as well? They were queers without a doubt. Why aren't they right up there with all the other "gay icons"?
Pedophile Allen Ginsberg is featured on the LGBT website, author of the tasteful little poem, "Sweet Boy, Give Me Your Ass." Ginsberg used to display films of himself masturbating over pictures of little lads.
http://lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/featured-right/daniel-radcliffe-on-homophobia-kill-your-darlings/
Any objection is categorized as ...you've guessed, homophobia!
Harry Hay is there, described as a "pioneer of gay liberation". Yeah, he was also a lifelong member of NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association, which marched on all the USA Gay Parades for the first twenty years. It is hand in glove with the LGBT movement. They should really call themselves LGBTP  - Lesbian, Gay, Bisesexual, Transexual and PEDOPHILE.
http://www.lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/calendar/Archive_2008/LGBT%20History%20Month%20Events.php?recordID=378
Franklin Kameny is there, that pioneer of gay rights and another supporter of NAMBLA. He was their public speaker at a meeting in 1981. He also publicly defended bestiality and wrote "Let's have all the perversions, more and better perversions."
W.H. Auden is included over and over again. A self-confessed pedophile, he made no secret of the fact that he hired boys in German and American brothels.
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/11/04/books/the-boys-in-berlin-auden-s-secret-poems.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
Freddie Mercury is also featured as a "gay" icon - the singer who died of AIDS after a life of wild promiscuity. Because children need role-models. (sic)

There are many proud references on the LGBT History Month website to Leonarda da Vinci. Shame they keep getting him muddled up with Michelangelo. One contributor burbles mindlessly that Leonardo created the famous "hyper-homo-David" [sic].  Look guys, Leonardo was the one with the beard, who wrote notebooks. Michelangelo was the one with the broken nose, who wrote poems - get it?
http://lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/featured-right/homophobias-still-going-strong-in-21st-century-comedy/
We are told that he suffered from epilepsy, which makes him a disabled "gay". http://lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/schools/famous-disabled-lgbt-people/
They boast about him rather briefly in Bulletin 29,
"1452 Leonardo da Vinci born 555 years ago. Italian artist and scientist"  - and that's all. Yeah, just "artist and scientist" then they rush on to Virginia Woolf who is described as "Foremost writer in the ‘modernist’ cannon" [sic ...and there is no mention of Mr Leonard Woolf either].
Leonardo gets another glowing accolade in the document "Anti-Bullying Campaign Form Time Activities"....
www.lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/documents/FormTimeActivities.doc
And there he is again in the Power Point Presentation "LGBT Pioneers in STEM"
The lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans people who impacted on science, technology, maths and science and who helped change the world ...
Leonardo, described as "Genius" in his career description, is right up there.
Let's make this clear  - if the rumours about Leonardo da Vinci are to be believed at all, then he was a pedophile. He was first accused of the crime of Sodom in 1476 when he was aged 24. There is no absolute necessity to believe it but you cannot separate the homosexuality from the pederasty. Contemporaries gossiped salaciously about him having relations with one of his apprentices, Salai, a boy aged ten [which is somewhat older than the pupils for whom these teaching materials are designed.]
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_life_of_Leonardo_da_Vinci

Along with the pedophiles LGBT History Month features famous Nazis such as Ernst Rohm and even more loveable characters such as the Roman Emperor Hadrian....Yes, people who cannot even spell the word emperor are holding up this man, one of the worst persecutors of the ancient world, as a hero, because he was "gay".

http://lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/history/lgbt-people/biographies/emporer-hadrian/

Our glorious gay-educators tell children that Hadrian "had a reputation for being affable and doing things by the rule-book."  Well, that's not what it says in the Jewish Encyclopaedia. It says that he set out to eradicate the Jews from the Roman Empire and his troops at Alexandria massacred fifty thousand of them in a single day. He then tore down the temple in Jerusalem and put a statue of himself there instead.
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/7015-hadrian
This pogram has been described as the "first Holocaust". [Er, what was that about an anti-bullying campaign?...]

HADRIAN:Roman emperor (117-138). At the very beginning of his reign he was called upon to suppress the final outbreaks of Jewish rebellion at Cyrene and Alexandria. According to a late but trustworthy source, he is said to have enticed the Jews of Alexandria into the open country, where about 50,000 of them were killed by his soldiers (Eliyahu R. xxx. 3). ... The temple of Jupiter towered on the site of the ancient Temple, with a statue of Hadrian in the interior (Jerome, Comm. on Isaiah ii. 9). The Jews now passed through a period of bitter persecution; Sabbaths, festivals, the study of the Torah, and circumcision were interdicted, and it seemed as if Hadrian desired to annihilate the Jewish people. His anger fell upon all the Jews of his empire, for he imposed upon them an oppressive poll-tax (Appian, "Syrian War," § 50). After this the Jews did not hold Hadrian's memory in high honor; the Talmud and Midrash follow his name with the curse "Crush his bones." His reign is called the time of persecution and danger, and the blood of many martyrs is charged to his account.  (Gen. R. lxiii. 7).

 There is no limit to the crass, abysmal ignorance of "Gay" History Month. Such a level of illiteracy would be disgraceful even in the pupils, let alone in the so-called teachers and those who design the teaching materials.
   Shovelling patiently through the chaos of the GHM site we come to a selection of cheery games such as word-searches and quizzes designed to promote and glorify queerdom in all its forms  - including fake.
Here we have a quiz page to be used for school pupils!
http://lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/quizzes/

Picture Quiz
Famous people who have had a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or Transgender identity ascribed to them...even if it wasn't true.
How many can you name from their pictures?
1. Florence Nightingale – founder of modern nursing. [Rubbish: Florence Nightingale was not a homosexual. See 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/florence-nightingale-a-new-biography-sheds-light-on-the-lady-with-the-lamp-942339.html  The most recent  - and thorough  - biography of Florence Nightingale by Mark Bostridge.  On the subject of "the idea of Florence Nightingale as a lesbian" he comments crisply, "There's no evidence for that!" Florence Nightingale: The Woman and her Legend by Mark Bostridge. pub. Viking 2008]

2. Noel Coward – actor, composer, playwright, cabaret artist.
3. Bessie smith – blues singer.
4. Boy George – singer, songwriter, dj. [ Really?  I had heard that he might be an infamous thug and drug-addict with a string of charges for narcotic-abuse, assault and criminal behaviour.]
5. Nadia Almada – trans winner of Big Brother.
6. James Baldwin – writer, civil rights activist.
7. Dusty Springfield – singer.
8. William Shakespeare – poet and playwright. [ Crude and amateur criticism of the worst kind. Shakespeare's sonnets make it clear that his relationship with the young man was not physical and even W.H. Auden has written to the same effect  - that the ideas and emotions expressed in them are far from those experienced by a homosexual. But children who know nothing about Shakespeare and will never read a single one of his plays are being fed  this preconception.]
9. Will Young – singer.[would you call him that?]
10. Plato – philosopher. [They've got this wrong  - they surely mean Socrates?]
11. Jan Morris – trans travel writer and journalist.
12. k. d. lang – singer songwriter.
13. Vikram Seth – novelist.
14. Queen Anne – monarch.[Who actually had at least ten children. Whoops!]
15. Sir Ian McKellen – actor.
16. Cyril Nri – actor, director, writer – currently starring as Supt. Adam Okara in “The Bill”.
17. James Miranda Barry – Woman who posed as male throughout her life, became a doctor (when only men could) and married. Was only discovered to be female when her body was examined after death.[So what?]
18. Alice Walker – writer and activist.
19. Tinky Winky – a Teletubby.[Oh that's great, what a wonderful role-model and icon, a tele-tubby!!!]
20. Mark Sheehily – singer, member of Westlife.
21. Ellen Generes – actor, comedian.
22. Issac Newton – scientist. [YES THEY CAN'T EVEN SPELL HIS NAME and it is a complete myth that he was homosexual. If we consult this for example :-
http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/prism.php?id=40   From Isaac Newton's Personal Life
The Newton Project Professor Rob Iliffe  Director, AHRC Newton Papers Project.Scott Mandelbrote, Fellow & Perne librarian, Peterhouse, Cambridge University of Sussex, East Sussex - BN1 9SH - newtonproject@sussex.ac.uk
"It has also been suggested - though this is purely conjectural and much disputed - that he was a repressed homosexual, which if true would undoubtedly have placed a man of his background and upbringing under extreme mental strain."
Although "Even in his maturity, having become rich, famous, laden with honours and internationally acclaimed as one of the world's foremost thinkers, he remained deeply insecure, given to fits of depression and outbursts of violent temper, and implacable in pursuit of anyone by whom he felt threatened....
[ Well yes, that certainly does sound like a lot of "gay" people we know but it's not conclusive evidence, is it?...]

http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/8017/was-sir-isaac-newton-a-homosexual
What evidence is there to support the claim that Newton was a homosexual? Referring to the book Sir Isaac Newton: Brilliant Mathematician and Scientist:
(by Natalie M. Rosinsky) it writes
"[Isaac Newton] spent almost all of 1689 in London [...] At that time, Newton began what was possibly the strongest personal relationship of his life. It was with a young Swiss mathematician named Nicolas Fatio de Duillier [...] While there is no proof that either man was homosexual, their letters suggest that their affection for one another was romantic."  [ Which is of course very different  from following the lifestyle referred to so inaptly as "gay".]

http://sex.omg-facts.com/Sex+Facts/Isaac-Newton-Died-A-Virgin/58027
 Isaac Newton stated on his deathbed that he was a virgin. He said this to the doctor attending him and Voltaire who knew him well testified to it. 
Imagine if today's schoolchildren were taught about Great Men and Women who Died Virgins. What kind of impact would that have on their minds  - and on their priorities?

I had to laugh when I read this about Michelangelo: "So why is he a gay icon? He maintained his sexuality despite his deeply pious religious beliefs. He was 57 when he fell in love with Tommaso ‘de Cavalieri but they stayed together until his death at 59." Yes, that's right! A whole two years!
http://lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/.../michaelangelo-buonarotti/

 Michelangelo did indeed have some very passionate feelings towards Tommaso de'Cavalieri (whose name the  LGBTs cannot even spell). But it was never a physical relationship, according to Vasari and all the detailed biographies. Michelangelo never opposed Cavalieri's marriage. Moreover, Michelangelo had a fourteen-year relationship with a woman, Vittoria Colonna, to whom he also wrote love letters and poems. Both relationships remained utterly chaste and Michelangelo lived a life of high principled self-restraint. It is simply wrong to portray him as "gay" with the sort of connotations that entails. By the way, Michelangelo did not die at the age of 59 either!
 
The LGBT curriculum asserts that gay children need "role-models". But science has proved conclusively that nobody is born gay and there is no gay gene, therefore there is no such thing as a "gay child". There is certainly no such thing as a "transsexual" child either. There are disturbed children, yes ,and there will be more as a result of this agenda.
 
Suggested texts for young children include  Bill’s New Frock ...
"Bill wakes up one morning to discover that he has become a girl. That day at school he discovers that people can make all sorts of assumptions about you because of what sex you are – or even just how you look. ...."
This is gross indoctrination. It will confuse children and make them worry in case they can suddenly change sex. It is meant to make them regard transsexualism as normal - but of course it isn't. Remember this is being pushed at young kids, aged 5 upwards!
      The LGBT agenda involves teaching them a central core of lies e.g.the belief that homosexuality is genetic and innate, or that people can be "born in the wrong body". Science can easily disprove these assertions but science is increasingly banned from the classroom in favour of so-called "gay rights". Eight independent scientific studies carried out all over the world prove conclusively that nobody is born homosexual :-

http://www.hollanddavis.com/?p=3647

And if, as these LGBT people say, orientation is innate, then logically there would be no need to teach it would there?
     The impact of the indoctrination is many sided. One outcome is the rocketing number of young people now demanding sex-change treatments even surgery, which is frequently the start of a lifetime of misery. Sex cannot be changed. Unlike orientation, it is genetic and innate, therefore fixed. Superficial tampering is just mutilation.
     The LGBT History month website includes a link to the original Gay Rights Manifesto of 1971, which demanded the legalisation of pedophilia, prostitution, soliciting and transexual silliness. It also offers a revised version that attacks the family as an oppressive institution:
"Monogamy is usually based on ownership - the woman sells her services to the man in return for security for herself and her children - and is entirely bound up in the man's idea of property furthermore in our society the monogamous couple, with or without children, is an isolated, shut-in, up-tight unit, suspicious of and hostile to outsiders. 
Yet although this struggle will be hard, [sic]and our victories not easily won [sob sob], we are not in fact being idealistic to aim at abolishing the family and the cultural distinctions between men and women. True, these have been with us throughout history, yet humanity is at last in a position where we can progress beyond this...."
Progress? No, just degeneracy, and lies, written by crackpots.
          It is time for all those who care what is taught in our schools and why to stand up and publicly condemn this harmful nonsense. It is a disaster from every point of view. We should be teaching children about moral values and noble ideals, not to worship a pack of pedophiles.


Toolkits for primary and for secondary schools :-
http://lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/schools/lgbt-history-month-in-schools-toolkit/

http://americansfortruth.com/2007/05/21/gay-rights-icon-frank-kameny-spoke-at-nambla-meeting-in-1981/


Note that pupils of "Gay" History Month are not being taught about Britten's music. Most of the people who run GHM have never heard any of Britten's music and could not sit through anything more demanding than a pop single. But they are shoving Britten's name and face in front of children and saying  - look, this man is famous and he's "gay" so that's a great thing to be, right? Needless to say there is no logic in this way of teaching. Would you teach children that T.S. Eliot was a cigarette smoker and Dylan Thomas was an alcoholic, so it's a good idea to copy them? Carl Orff was a nazi, so copy that? Teaching of art and music is now at an all-time low in British schools. I took part in Noye's Fludde when I was 10 but nobody dragged Britten's private life into it.

Sunday, 10 November 2013

Shameful Betrayal of Portsmouth Shipyard Workers

The Coalition government plummets to new lows every day and every week.  When there is a contract to be given for building Royal Navy ships, they give it to Korea. Meanwhile, 1,600 workers at Portsmouth are being made redundant. These men are being flung on the scrap heap, their chances of ever getting another job are remote. Their lives are devastated and their families will be forced to claim benefits, adding to our ever-spiralling welfare bills.
The decision is no surprise: earlier this year the Ford Transit factory in Southampton was closed down because of EU policies that handed 180,000 euros to the Ford company to open a new factory in Turkey instead.  And look what happened to the Twinings factory in Tyneside that was closed down in 2010 so that Twinings could re-open in Poland ...with EU subsidies.
 The whole community in Portsmouth will be affected by this latest decision. Recession spreads...
Philip Hammond's decision is a knife in the back for British workers and specifically for the English. I have always been a unionist but the favouritism of successive UK governments towards Scotland is a scandal. Why is it that English shipyards are now not capable of building large-scale warships? Because they have been denied the investment. They have been downgraded so that Scottish shipbuilding yards on the Clyde could be upgraded. This is perverse and it is nothing but a way of buying Scottish votes. There is absolutely no reason why the same industry could not flourish just as well or better on the Mersey, on Tyneside, on the Severn or on the Medway. The Medway is the second biggest natural harbour in the world. Portsmouth could very easily have been developed and expanded to be capable of taking on the modern contracts, but it never was   - because government policy has been for so long to create and preserve jobs in Scotland. Now disgracefully we are exporting our English jobs.
  The government would not dare to destroy Scottish jobs with the referendum on Scottish independence coming up. It is being intimidated by Alex Salmon and co, yet treating English workers with contempt.
    This policy of favouring Scotland has gone on for a long time. There used to be a major shipbuilding yard at Chatham in Kent until it was closed and the jobs shifted North to Scotland. It was a way of safeguarding Labour votes in Scotland while creating unemployment in the Medway area. A similar policy has been followed in regard to fishing, car-building, aerospace and even public sector jobs, which are regularly placed up in Scotland out of all proportion to their population. England is taken for granted. No wonder now people are joining the English Democrat party in rising numbers.
England is the Cinderella in this story. Politicians will continue to ignore England at their peril. There are fewer than 200,000 net tax payers in Scotland and most of those are English. There is virtually no conservative vote and the Scots would get a shock if they woke up and found that they needed a visa to get a job in England, the "foreign" country that has subsidized them and defended them for such a long time.

Saturday, 9 November 2013

Expel Caroline Lucas from Parliament

Green MP Caroline Lucas should be expelled from her seat in the House of Commons after taking part in a disgraceful demonstration outside Parliament on 5th November.
A couple of hundred of unruly protesters wearing Guy Fawkes masks lit bonfires outside the House of Commons and shouted slogans that included "Arson!" and "Fight back!"
The obvious references to Guy Fawkes' gunpowder plot, which attempted to blow up Parliament in 1604, were as crude as they were tasteless. And MP Caroline Lucas took part in this overt accolade of terrorist violence. Sh should be ashamed of herself, and she should certainly be chucked out for this grossly improper behaviour. We know the Greens have scant respect for any sort of democracy and prefer "hands-on" solutions such as piracy and vandalism.
The pretext for the demonstration was to protest against high fuel prices, which is sheer hypocrisy. One of the main reasons for our steeply rising fuel prices is the cost of implementing Green policies. Building useless wind farms, paying subsidies to the land owners who host them, and taxing carbon emissions are all policies that are bound to make energy more expensive. Wind turbines cost £48,000 each, have a short working life and some have been calculated to produce as little as £5 worth of electricity per MONTH. When you tot up the costs of manufacturing them, installing them and running them, they end up making a loss. And since they only work some of the time, they need a 24-hour backup from "conventional" generating sources. So there is no point in building them at all!
20% of your energy bill is VAT and that is an EU policy which we cannot oppose so long as we remain within the European union  - and staying in is of course the policy of the Greens and Libdems. Their contradictions are lamentable. Following their ideas has created a looming energy shortage that will mean more than just high prices in the near future. It will means cuts and blackouts. It will mean that more and more old and poor people die of the cold.
There are many people who think we are paying too much for our energy  - but why didn't Caroline Lucas join a responsible law-abiding protest like the one that took place in Reading this week?
 If she must side with hooligans and terrorists, she is not fit to be an MP.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24826855

http://www.taxpayersalliance.com/grassroots/2013/11/reading-supporters-fight-energy-swindle.html

http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/the-48-000-government-wind-turbine-generates-5-worth-of-electricity-month-123141809.html